.

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

'Compare the difference in gender roles and socialization processes in relation to the Smith family\r'

'The purpose of this assignment is to comp ar the difference in sex roles and socialization processes in relation to the metal fashioner family. It will give a brief taleing of gender roles and socialization and will withstand into account the situation of Jane and David and it will also gestate at the thoughts of Janes eighteen-year-old daughter Katherine. Gender roles atomic number 18 said to set off from birth with the classification of raise. As in exclusively systems of ascription, even though most battalion trust that sex role demeanour f petty(a)s natur all in ally, from biological or inborn differences, societies do not leave that victimization to choice or possibility.\r\nInstead, from the earliest years, before they r reveal out understand a word, infants ar told what their sexual individualism is, and argon praised for any behavioural evidence of divert activity. Adults will describe an infant as having lofty female traits, if told its a girl (sweet, cute , charming) and as having high-fl knowledge male traits if told its a boy (strong, destructive, rebellious). What begins in early childhood continues by means of the years. For generations girls have been praised for their maternal behaviour with dolls, and boys were told they were sissies if they showed the homogeneous behaviour.\r\nThe family, second edition, rascal 75). According to Connell in intromission to sociology Talcott Parsons argues that the biological facts of sex and reproduction limit the sex gender roles available to males and females. In other linguistic process females social roles are chief(prenominal)ly to produce and operate up children while males are to put forward the main re outsets of survival. Connell disagrees and believes that sexuality as well as gender is formed by social influences and ain choice. (Introduction to sociology, knave 187).\r\nAnn Oakley argues that gender roles are cultural rather than biological; humans learn the behaviour t hat is pass judgment of males and females in spite of appearance their society. (Sociology themes and perspectives knave 589) Gender behaviour is first learnt through primary or basic socialization deep down the family and is reinforced later in almost every area of social life for example, at discipline and at work. Socialization refers to the various ways in which a child learns to act in a way acceptable to a given(p) society.\r\nOakley argues that as a young baby grows, they are interact into their disparate gender roles through their contact with opposite people and institutions. By the age of sixteen the majority of young men and women have been socialized into a belief of male dominance, even though the forces of deviation to this attitude are stronger than they were and patterns of socialization based on gender equality occur much frequently. (Introduction to sociology scallywag 184-194) Socialization is the process by which human behaviour is formed through ex periences in social situations.\r\n through socialization the individual learns the values, norms and thought of a given society. Cooley (1864-1929) distinguished deuce types of socialization: primary and secondary. The two forms of socialization are defined partly in terms of the particular groups or agencies in which they take place. Primary groups are small they entail face-to-face relationship and allow the individual to express the entire self; the family, peer groups and close friends are all primary groups. Within these groups the individual learns, by personal experiences the primary values such as love, loyalty, justice, and sharing.\r\nFreud accent that the first few years of a person life, those commonly spent among primary groups are the most significant in forming the structure of his or her behaviour. subaltern groups are large, much classical, more properly structured, and survive for particular purposes. Secondary socialization involves learning how to take shape and conduct oneself in formal contexts and how to behave towards people who have different degrees of position or authority. (Introduction to sociology page 3)\r\nThompson, N (2001) states that the pressure to match to sex-appropriate roles within the olden family is both a major part of the acculturation process and a significant aspect of sexism. patriarchic beliefs promote the traditional model of the family, with the male scratchwinner organism the main provider, head of the rest home and defender of his territory, the married woman and mother as nurturer and carer and their dependent children whom they socialise into pursuit in the footsteps of the appropriate role model, boys like soda pop and girls like mummy.\r\nAnti discriminatory practice page 42) Jane notions that she is creditworthy for looking afterwards her father. Pilcher (1995) cites Finchs evidence that women provide the great majority of personal care to relatives and that the arouse to child rela tionship is the most important source of support after the spouse relationship. Children, mainly daughters, are a major source of support for gray parents. (Age and Generation in Modern Britain page123).\r\nThese feelings Jane is experiencing are by chance due to the behaviour she learned through her own socialisation within her family, For example, Jane believes that her mother would have expected her to look after her father, therefore she would live up to her mothers expectations if she takes on the responsibility of carer to her father and secondly, her experience of development up as a female was that women were responsible for household and domestic tasks.\r\nAnn Oakley believes that males and females are exposed to different activities through out childhood for example; girls are mainly encouraged to become involved in domestic tasks. (Sociology themes and perspectives page 590) This would explain Janes behaviour in her own house as she does most of the household chores, e ven though Jane and her husband equally work full time. David thinks that his father should go and live with him and his partner, he hasnt asked his partner yet how she feels near this.\r\nDavid may feel through his own socialization that it is his duty as the son in the family to take control of the situation. David is hoping that his wife will be willing to give up her part time job to look after his father, â€Å"Women in this society are generally the active caregivers, (typically the eldest daughter or daughter-in-law) (AARP Magazine) David hasnt mentioned swelled up his job, this could be Patriarchal gender through socialisation, David thinking he is the man of the house and the main bread winner and has authority over his wifes say.\r\nHis wife working part time and she is probably on low pay, to David her job may not be important as it is a second wage, mayhap financially it would be better for her to give up her job, just now he isnt thinking how his wife would feel round doing this. (Anti discriminatory practice page 42-43). Janes eighteen-year-old daughter Katherine has c erstrns about her mother. This could be down to counterchanges and different expectation through generations.\r\nThe fact that, Katherine is in higher education put forward that her prospects and opportunities are higher than that of her mothers. Women are beginning to change their attitudes in the direction of greater approval of more equal gender behaviour, and as a resolving power a more equal sharing of housework. In addition, as a clear indication of the future, jr. women, women with more education and wifes with better educated husbands were more likely to move towards independent gender attitudes.\r\nThe family 133-135) In conclusion, the guilt Jane is experiencing and Davids thoughts in deciding how to care for his far is common and is a product of societies expectations. David and Jane havent rattling giving any thought to the situation or consequences of their father. They are both acting on what they think would be expected of them by their mother and through their socialisation, that is to look after their father.\r\nNeither of them has taking the thoughts of their father into consideration, although Michael is acquire very forgetful, he still has right to choice, maybe Michael usage pauperization to live with them or wont want them to look after him, Michael if possible, might want to stay in his own home. Jane and David cant and shouldnt really try to make any decisions without firstly get an assessment done on their father, this should happen once they get in contact with the social worker, and secondly they should also both speak to their family to find out how they feel about the situation, after all what decisions are made involves them as well.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment