Unethical Behavior in Forensic Science

The acquittal of Peter atomic number 28 in February of 2004 from assertions that he was responsible for the oddment of his long-time employee Gary Rowley in a major car accident was a when Nickels Defense lawyer, Gary M. Wilson, accuses the Detroit police of tempering license.Crowley was said to be on the drivers seat while Nickel was at the motortrucks pack bed. A faulty roadway and a hypertrophied tire was said to be the major cause for the accident as Cowley was thrown off the truck and was pinned under the trucks cargo bed when it veered off the road, rolled over and hit a telephone set pole.Both victims were said to have been intoxicated prior to the accident but accusations on Nickels intentional involvement in the incident was launch into question when Wilson argued that the police had switched the original blown-up tire to conceal evidence and obtain conviction.Mr. Wilsons allegations were later found to be true when a sheriff deputy admitted to have made the switch. Automotive forensic scientist, Sal Fariello, gave his expert imprint on the case, testifying that most DUI crashes cannot be convicted by mere alcohol tipsiness alone since most accidents would have happened anyway even if the persons involved were sober.There seems to be rampant cases involving incompetent law enforcers and investigators who tamper with evidences in order to substantially solve the case and move on to another. The case exemplified here is a classic scenario of intentional tampering of evidence and authorities should consider how to transport and prevent such mistakes from recurring in crime scenes.ReferenceResponsibility in DUI Laws, Inc. (2004, February 13). Police Evidence Tampering in High Profile DUI vehicle Homicide Case. Retrieved April 19, 2009, from http//www.ridl.us/articles/policeTampering.html.