Case Study Analysis: Union Carbide Corporation And Bhopal Essay

The Political, Social, and Legal Environment of BusinessCase Study Analysis substance Carbide Corporation and BhopalA single slip in action whitethorn cause lasting sorrow. A slight misunderstanding in mathematical operation at a trade union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal of India causes a ken of deaths and injuries. What a tragedy it is. Undoubtedly, there must be something wrong with the instruction of the plant.In addition to the plant, the governments related in India that issued permits and provided incentives for the plant, Bhopal community officials who permitted slum dwellers to pass away near the plant in illegal settlements, Indian environmental and natural rubber inspectors should also be trusty for this. The governments related in India issued permits because people bespeak jobs, or people would starve to death. This was genius conclude in my opinion. brushed money from Union Carbide plant may be an separate reason for issuing permits. It was clearly that the governments in America would non issue a permit to Union Carbide plant under such circumstances, which lacked of severe environmental standards and permitted slum dwellers to live near the plant and so on. Such actions were the fuses track to more deaths. Before the major gas leakage from the MCI unit on December 3, 1984, some people were killed because of phosgene gas leakage. However, no one took it badly in spite of the report by media. One of the reasons that people trim back this was because people didnt know the potential riskiness of the chemical plant. The other reason was that there are not enough environmental inspectors to assure so many plants in India. Besides, those inspectors had a record of loose enforcement. Consequently, danger emerged just as the saying goes Nothing comes of nothing.As for the management of Union Carbides Bhopal plant, some steps indeed needed to be improved. allow us take a look at the wholly appendage of the gas leak and see what a ctions can be improved. The first mistake in my opinion was that R. Khan, an operator in the MIC complex, neglected to insert a slip blind above the point of water entry. This omission violate instructions in the MIC processing manual, the technical manual that set frontward procedures established by the chemical engineers who set up the plant. Obviously, the plant failed to try the importance of obeying the processing manual and the danger of disobeying ... ...nk he should be responsible for the whole case. In other words, he should resign for the whole incident. more often than not speaking, the legal system didnt play a very alive(p) role in this case. First of all, the India government could do more on digging the truth of the gas leak out and set a more strict standard to regulate such dangerous plants in case that another crisis. Second, I didnt see any one who worked in the Union Carbides Bhopal plant should be responsible for that tragedy. Does it plastered that all t hat the India court valued was money or it just wanted to reduce trial and subsequent appeals because it might have taken more than twenty years?To sum up, Union Carbide handled the crisis cleverly but not well enough because it knew what would the India government and court react to this incident. Union Carbide controlled the whole situation and took lead of the lawsuits itself. The India government and court didnt help those victims as much as they needed instead. The function of government, designed to protect its people, disappeared in this case.BIBLIOGRAPHYUnion Carbide Corporation And Bhopal, in Steiner and Steiner, pp.147-161.